Structured records
Capture definitions, notes, examples, source evidence, ownership, and review state.
Feature
Move from raw terms to reviewed concepts with definitions, examples, relationships, and usage rules.

Many translation mistakes begin when a term is treated as a standalone word. Concept development starts with the underlying idea: what it means, where it appears, which terms compete with it, and how it changes by domain or audience.
Idanium helps teams shape concepts collaboratively before assigning equivalents across languages, registers, reading levels, and document types.
Capture definitions, notes, examples, source evidence, ownership, and review state.
Connect broader, narrower, related, deprecated, competing, and historical concepts.
Keep the concept stable while terms vary by language, register, script, and audience.
Move concepts from candidate to reviewed, approved, deprecated, or disputed.
What this adds
When a concept is well modeled, many downstream tasks become easier: translation, simplification, search, QA, and training material.
Document the meaning before deciding which word should be used in each language.
Attach examples, source citations, usage notes, and domain labels to support decisions.
Record when a concept changes, when a term is deprecated, and when older translations need review.
Connected records
The more context a concept carries, the less likely a team is to make a shallow word-for-word decision.
Store preferred, allowed, forbidden, informal, historical, and region-specific labels.
Show real sentences, document fragments, and approved translations where the concept appears.
Link parent concepts, subtypes, near equivalents, false friends, and jurisdiction-specific variants.
Assign subject-matter reviewers and terminology owners for accountability.