Feature

Concept development

Move from raw terms to reviewed concepts with definitions, examples, relationships, and usage rules.

Concept graph for terminology development

Build the idea before choosing the word.

Many translation mistakes begin when a term is treated as a standalone word. Concept development starts with the underlying idea: what it means, where it appears, which terms compete with it, and how it changes by domain or audience.

Idanium helps teams shape concepts collaboratively before assigning equivalents across languages, registers, reading levels, and document types.

Structured records

Capture definitions, notes, examples, source evidence, ownership, and review state.

Relationship mapping

Connect broader, narrower, related, deprecated, competing, and historical concepts.

Language separation

Keep the concept stable while terms vary by language, register, script, and audience.

Review maturity

Move concepts from candidate to reviewed, approved, deprecated, or disputed.

What this adds

Concepts become reusable building blocks.

When a concept is well modeled, many downstream tasks become easier: translation, simplification, search, QA, and training material.

01

Definition first

Document the meaning before deciding which word should be used in each language.

02

Evidence-backed

Attach examples, source citations, usage notes, and domain labels to support decisions.

03

Change-aware

Record when a concept changes, when a term is deprecated, and when older translations need review.

Connected records

A concept record can connect many kinds of knowledge.

The more context a concept carries, the less likely a team is to make a shallow word-for-word decision.

Terms and synonyms

Store preferred, allowed, forbidden, informal, historical, and region-specific labels.

Examples

Show real sentences, document fragments, and approved translations where the concept appears.

Relations

Link parent concepts, subtypes, near equivalents, false friends, and jurisdiction-specific variants.

Owners

Assign subject-matter reviewers and terminology owners for accountability.